http://medagogy.edublogs.org/2007/05/07/good-teaching-not-good-technology-student-learning/ My take on the strategies, techniques, and approaches used to engage learners in the 21st Century. Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:28:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://medagogy.edublogs.org/2007/05/07/good-teaching-not-good-technology-student-learning/comment-page-1/#comment-44 MEDagogy » Blog Archive » “Study finds that poor teaching leads to poor learning” Fri, 18 May 2007 06:29:32 +0000 http://medagogy.edublogs.org/2007/05/07/good-teaching-not-good-technology-student-learning/#comment-44 [...] I have written about this before. Here and here. [...] [...] I have written about this before. Here and here. [...]

]]> http://medagogy.edublogs.org/2007/05/07/good-teaching-not-good-technology-student-learning/comment-page-1/#comment-41 Room With A View » Seeing No Progress, Some Schools Drop Laptops Sat, 12 May 2007 10:58:49 +0000 http://medagogy.edublogs.org/2007/05/07/good-teaching-not-good-technology-student-learning/#comment-41 [...] An article in the NY Times entitled Seeing No Progress, Some Schools Drop Laptops regarding Liverpool Central School District’s decision to pull the plug on their 1 to 1 laptop program has created quite a stir. It’s easy to see the flaws in the article. I won‘t do so here because it’s already been done by David Warlick, Stephen Downes, Justin Medved and many others. My concern is that in our world where decisions are made based on shallow analysis and thirty second sound bites, districts considering the merits of a 1 to 1 laptop program may use this article in their deliberations. That would be scandalous. [...] [...] An article in the NY Times entitled Seeing No Progress, Some Schools Drop Laptops regarding Liverpool Central School District’s decision to pull the plug on their 1 to 1 laptop program has created quite a stir. It’s easy to see the flaws in the article. I won‘t do so here because it’s already been done by David Warlick, Stephen Downes, Justin Medved and many others. My concern is that in our world where decisions are made based on shallow analysis and thirty second sound bites, districts considering the merits of a 1 to 1 laptop program may use this article in their deliberations. That would be scandalous. [...]

]]> http://medagogy.edublogs.org/2007/05/07/good-teaching-not-good-technology-student-learning/comment-page-1/#comment-40 Thinking Allowed. » Blog Archive » My turn Thu, 10 May 2007 15:19:20 +0000 http://medagogy.edublogs.org/2007/05/07/good-teaching-not-good-technology-student-learning/#comment-40 [...] So I am late chiming in on the NY Times laptop article. You know the one…the one that says one-to-one laptops are not showing any improvement in learning and schools are ditching their programs left and right. Justin wrote a great post on it over at Medagogy. Chris Lehmann chimed in over at Practical Theory. Warlick put in his 2 pennies. In the Ed Tech blogosphere, this article is everywhere. [...] [...] So I am late chiming in on the NY Times laptop article. You know the one…the one that says one-to-one laptops are not showing any improvement in learning and schools are ditching their programs left and right. Justin wrote a great post on it over at Medagogy. Chris Lehmann chimed in over at Practical Theory. Warlick put in his 2 pennies. In the Ed Tech blogosphere, this article is everywhere. [...]

]]>